Currently viewing the tag: "Obama"

Question: Really, why is there a Birth question over Obama if the Constitution says the following?
ge and Citizenship requirements – US Constitution, Article II, Section 1

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

Term limit amendment – US Constitution, Amendment XXII, Section 1 – ratified February 27, 1951

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

Natural-born citizen

Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?

The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying legislation in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, which includes citizenship.

Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

* Anyone born inside the United States *
* Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
* Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
* Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
* Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
* A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.

Separate sections handle territories that the United States has acquired over time, such as Puerto Rico (8 USC 1402), Alaska (8 USC 1404), Hawaii (8 USC 1405), the U.S. Virgin Islands (8 USC 1406), and Guam (8 USC 1407). Each of these sections confer citizenship on persons living in these territories as of a certain date, and usually confer natural-born status on persons born in those territories after that date. For example, for Puerto Rico, all persons born in Puerto Rico between April 11, 1899, and January 12, 1941, are automatically conferred citizenship as of the date the law was signed by the President (June 27, 1952). Additionally, all persons born in Puerto Rico on or after January 13, 1941, are natural-born citizens of the United States. Note that because of when the law was passed, for some, the natural-born status was retroactive.

The law contains one other section of historical note, concerning the Panama Canal Zone and the nation of Panama. In 8 USC 1403, the law states that anyone born in the Canal Zone or in Panama itself, on or after February 26, 1904, to a mother and/or father who is a United States citizen, was “declared” to be a United States citizen. Note that the terms “natural-born” or “citizen at birth” are missing from this section.

In 2008, when Arizona Senator John McCain ran for president on the Republican ticket, some theorized that because McCain was born in the Canal Zone, he was not actually qualified to be president. However, it should be noted that section 1403 was written to apply to a small group of people to whom section 1401 did not apply. McCain is a natural-born citizen under 8 USC 1401(c): “a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying posses
So, do Birthers misquote the constitution, or have they not read it?
Doesn’t this mean that EVEN IF the conspiracy theory was true & Obama was born in Kenya, his mother would make him eligible for the US presidency?

Answer:

Answer by John Doe
Wow you figured it all out, good job.

Tagged with:
 

Question: How’s this for Obama speaking to school children?
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization received it’s official blessing in 1947.

In regards to young school children, UNESCO’S Director General appointed Julian Huxley, an atheistic philosopher & member of the British Fabian Society stated “….those qualities of citizenship which provide the foundation upon which international government must be based if it is to succeed said in Volume V. In the classroom with children 13 years of age the following:
(read carefully – it is quoted verbatim:

Before the child enters school his mind has already been profoundly marked and often injuriously by influencess …first gained, however dimly, in the home. On page 9 the teacher is told:

The kindergarten or infant school has a significant part to pay in the child’s education. Not only can it correct many of the errors of home training but it can also prepare the child for membership, at about age seven, in a group of his own age and habits – the first of many such social identifications that must be achieved on his way to membership in the world society.

It is frequently the family that infects the child with extreme nationalism. The school should therefore use the means described earlier to combat family attitudes”.

Obama is simply a pawn in following the agenda toward the one-world government by destroying family values in a most subtle way”.

The U.S. as a soverign Country is gravely at stake. We must wake up and wise up!

Source: NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON by John Stormer

Answer:

Answer by Jay
That’s kinda like Glenn Beck reading tea leaves.

Tagged with:
 

Question: Should Obama just repeal Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution?
So that the invasion can keep occurring? I was a fence-sitter because I like cheap gardeners but as I see the leftist display of il-logic, I say Arizonans have a GUARANTEED right to quell an invasion.

Oh here is the text by the way:

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”
You mean a state can now repeal the constitution?

Answer:

Answer by Yoda Cookie Monster
Should Arizona repeal the fourth Amendment?

Tagged with:
 

Question: Obama continues to claim that, “I will not rest unitl….”. Yet, his golf game is superb. How can this be?
“I’m not going to rest or be satisfied until the leak is stopped at the source, the oil in the Gulf is contained and cleaned up, and the people of the Gulf are able to go back to their lives and their livelihoods.” – Obama, B. Hussein, May 14, 2010

“We will not rest until we account for our fellow Americans in harms way.” – Obama, B. Hussein, January 12, 2010

“We will not rest until we find all who were involved and hold them accountable,” – Obama, B. Hussein, Dec 28, 2009

“I will not rest until businesses are investing again and businesses are hiring again and people have work again” – Obama, B. Hussein, Nov 23, 2009

“I will not rest until anybody who’s looking for a job can find one” – Obama, B. Hussein, Sep 2009

“I will not rest until the dream of health care reform is finally achieved in the United States of America” – Obama, B. Hussein, May 11, 2009.

“We will not rest until we reach a day when not one single veteran falls into homelessness” – Obama, B. Hussein, April 2009

http://www.therightscoop.com/obama-i-will-not-rest

Answer:

Answer by danrathersdrunkagain2
He swings like a girl.

Tagged with:
 

Actress Lea Thompson said that President Obama’s proposal to lower the percentage of charitable giving that people can deduct from their taxes will to a “certain extent” deter charitable giving. (By Nicholas Ballasy; Jon Schulter)

Presenter Heidi Jark discusses the new IRS form 990 and how it can affect your charitable giving plans and contributions.LEAVE A LEGACY® Southeast Michigan is a nine-county-wide campaign encouraging people to name non-profit organizations in their wills. The campaign, which is driven by the efforts of volunteers from non-profit groups, and financial, estate planning and law firms, is sponsored by the Planned Giving Roundtable of Southeast Michigan — a group of professionals in legal, financial, and allied fields as well as fundraising professionals whose focus is planned giving. The campaign resulted from a growing concern for non-profit organizations, who because of increasingly less government funding, are fighting to exist. And the problem worsens because this forces non-profit groups to rely more on public support; however, although 81.5% of people in Southeast Michigan give annually, only 2.8% leave a charitable bequest at death. LEAVE A LEGACY is addressing this problem by educating people about the importance of planned gifts for the charities we depend on and support. For more information visit www.leavealegacysoutheastmichigan.org, call (888) 826-7900 or e-mail leavelegacy@airadv.net.

Tagged with:
 

Question: Will you be voting for Obama if he is the DNC pick?

http://my.barackobama.com/page/dashboard/public/gGN9pM

http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=6203178D-C782-42E2-8D56-765A3D7EDCD7

For those of you who may not be familiar with Kindhearts, it is an off-shoot of the Holy Land Foundation, which has been on trial for attempting to mask support of terrorism as “charitable giving.” Kindhearts not only provided funds for Hamas, but its fundraising specialist – a man by the name of Muhammad El-Mezain – was the designated Hamas bag man in the US. And two months before the US government closed down Kindhearts, it was revealed that the South Asia Division Coordinator had known ties to al Qaeda, conducting a ten day tour of an al Qaeda recruitment center.

If you know a man by the company he keeps, then what can be said about Barack Obama. A fundraiser who funneled money to known terrorist groups funneling money to Obama? Why are people still going to vote for this con?

Answer:

Answer by me
yes i will
Obama 08!

Tagged with:
 

Question: Have you ever wondered how charitable Dem Obama supporter Okrah is?
“Oprah”: So I’m going to follow Mark Zuckerberg’s example and donate money to schools, too. Let’s see, he’s worth $ 6.9 billion dollars and donated $ 100 million, which is a little less than two percent of his net worth. Okay, that mean I’m writing a check for nineteen cents! Man, giving feels great!

http://tv.yahoo.com/daytime/blog/a-starter-house-in-the-zuckerburbs–346.html

Isn’t this the typical Democunt mindset? “that’s ALLLLL he is going to give?”

-I believe she is NOW paying for her own guests to travel to Australia? Instead of the millions being paid by the Australian people.

Answer:

Answer by Hi
At least they gave.
How is that not a lot of money?

Tagged with:
 

Question: Will you be voting for Obama if he is the DNC pick?

http://my.barackobama.com/page/dashboard/public/gGN9pM

http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=6203178D-C782-42E2-8D56-765A3D7EDCD7

For those of you who may not be familiar with Kindhearts, it is an off-shoot of the Holy Land Foundation, which has been on trial for attempting to mask support of terrorism as “charitable giving.” Kindhearts not only provided funds for Hamas, but its fundraising specialist – a man by the name of Muhammad El-Mezain – was the designated Hamas bag man in the US. And two months before the US government closed down Kindhearts, it was revealed that the South Asia Division Coordinator had known ties to al Qaeda, conducting a ten day tour of an al Qaeda recruitment center.

If you know a man by the company he keeps, then what can be said about Barack Obama. A fundraiser who funneled money to known terrorist groups funneling money to Obama? Why are people still going to vote for this con?

Answer:

Answer by Vinny_Says_Relax
Not a chance in hell would I ever vote for Obama.

Tagged with: